When families face disputes or divorce, the default response is often to turn to the legal system for resolution. While the law plays a critical role, focusing only on legal issues can lead to incomplete and sometimes damaging outcomes.
A holistic approach to family disputes considers not just legal rights and obligations but also the emotional, financial, and psychological well-being of all involved—especially children. We have to remember that each family is unique and works differently. That which works for one family cannot work for all families.
The Problem with a Legal-Only Focus
Legal proceedings are structured to resolve specific disputes based on legislation and precedent. However, a legal-only approach often:
Fails to address emotional and psychological harm – Courts are not designed to provide emotional support or conflict resolution beyond legal determinations. In South Africa this is usually the mandate of the Family Advocate, that must assist the court with investigating these aspects, however these offices are every so often completely overburdened and and investigation can sometimes take more than a year to conclude.
Increases conflict rather than resolving it – Litigation is adversarial by nature, often escalating tensions by pitting the parents against one another, rather than promoting cooperative solutions and finding a healthy way for families to move forward.
Overlooks financial strain – Legal battles are costly and can drain family resources that could be better spent on the well-being of children and future stability.
Creates fragmented solutions – Legal rulings may solve one issue but fail to address the interconnectedness of family dynamics, leading to repeated conflicts.
Why care and contact cannot be considered in isolation
Many legal disputes around divorce focus on care and contact (custody and visitation) as if it exists in a vacuum. In reality, it is deeply connected to:
1. Maintenance (Child Support)
Care and contact arrangements directly impact financial obligations. A parent with primary care responsibilities will have increased financial burdens, while the other parent’s financial contributions should reflect the real costs of raising a child. Addressing care and contact without considering maintenance can lead to unfair and impractical arrangements.
2. Domestic Violence
When domestic violence is a factor, granting care and contact without proper risk assessment can place children and the vulnerable parent in harm’s way. Courts often treat domestic violence as a separate issue from contact rights, and on the other side social service institutions often force parents to "stop their childish behavior and focus on the children", both these instances subjects the vulnerable parent to very emotionally and in some instances physically unsafe circumstances. But a holistic approach recognizes that a child's safety and emotional well-being are just as important as their legal right to see both parents. It also allows to put in place certain safe guards, such as a no-contact approach, parallel parenting, the appointment of a Parental Coordinator or exchanges of the children in public places to name a few. This approach also acknowledges that a parent that abuses their child's other parent, lacks parental capacity and the ability to act in the best interest of their child, and to place safeguards in place that protect these families.
The pitfalls of fragmented court jurisdictions
One of the biggest challenges families face in legal disputes is that different courts have different powers. For example:
The Children’s Court focus on rulings about care and contact issues.
The Maintenance Court can enforce financial obligations but does not address care and contact or domestic violence.
The Domestic Violence Court focus on issuing protection orders but does not readily make decisions about maintenance or care arrangements.
This means that a family in crisis may find itself navigating multiple legal processes simultaneously, each requiring different evidence, hearings, and expenses. The result?
Emotional exhaustion – Parents and children endure ongoing stress without a sense of closure.
Financial strain – Legal fees multiply, forcing families into debt or limiting their ability to move forward.
Contradictory outcomes – One court may issue a ruling that conflicts with another, creating further disputes instead of resolution.
Legal Abuse: When the system is used as a weapon
One of the most devastating but often overlooked aspects of family disputes is legal abuse. This occurs when one party weaponizes the legal system to harass, control, or financially cripple the other. Legal abuse includes:
Repeated and unnecessary litigation to drain the other party’s resources.
Filing frivolous motions to manipulate custody arrangements.
Using the court process to delay financial support or withhold child maintenance.
Leveraging protection orders dishonestly to gain strategic advantages.
Legal abuse prolongs disputes, traumatizes families, and prevents true healing. A holistic approach acknowledges these tactics and works toward minimizing their impact through mediation and integrated legal strategies.
The Need for a Holistic, Multi-Disciplinary Approach
A holistic approach to family disputes recognizes that legal, financial, emotional, and psychological factors are all interwoven. Solutions should include:
Mediation before litigation – Skilled mediators help families reach agreements that address all aspects of their situation, reducing the need for prolonged court battles.
Integrated legal and psychological support – Families should have access to legal professionals, therapists, and financial advisors working together.
Court system reform – The legal system should aim to reduce fragmented proceedings and promote unified family courts that handle all related matters together. Family disputes are a truly unique part of our legal system and should not follow the same process and enforcement of general civil matters. Only legal practitioners, that have received further training and qualification should be deemed suitably qualified, to be allowed to practice family law.
Conclusion
A purely legal approach to family disputes and divorce often fails to provide real, lasting solutions. Families need holistic interventions that consider financial realities, emotional well-being, and safety concerns. By integrating care and contact, maintenance, and domestic violence considerations into a single, comprehensive strategy, we can create resolutions that truly serve the best interests of children and their families.
At Mediation Garden Route, we are committed to helping families navigate these challenges with a holistic, solution-driven approach. If you need guidance, reach out today to explore how mediation can create a sustainable, family-focused resolution.
Comments